Tuesday, October 12, 2004

The Emperor's New Suit

Tailor to presidents Georges de Paris falls on his needle, says the box-bulge is just a pucker along the jacket's back seam. Wow. I've never seen a suit, or any garment, with a back like this -- except maybe that lumpy dress I once made in home economics, with the darts inside out.

Note to the White House press claque: Enough with the “internet conspiracy buffs” BS, hacks! This is something called a story. Remember those? Off your knees!

New: An earpiece in Bush made him an instant whiz kid on Indonesian politics, speculates State Department contract interpreter Fred Burks, who first interpreted for Bush at a September 19, 2001 meeting with Indonesian president Megawati Soekarnoputri. In a letter published on democrats.com and reprinted at this website, (and confirmed in a telephone conversation with IsBushWired) he says Bush displayed an astonishing grasp of obscure details of Indonesian politics during a 90-minute meeting. "I concluded either that Bush was much more intelligent than we had been led to believe, or that somehow someone was feeding answers to him through a hidden earpiece...Having worked directly with President Bush twice since then, and having additionally talked with many of my fellow interpreters who have worked directly with him, I am now certain that he could not have had that much knowledge of Indonesia. He doesn't even read the daily newspaper to keep up with what's being reported in the press. I am convinced that he must have been using some sort of earpiece through which someone was telling him what to say."

Odd Goings-on in Tennessee

Somebody claiming to be "Brad Menfil" of Knoxville, TN, recently posted on Portland's Indymedia site that he was told by a Bush campaign worker named Scott Zale that Bush is known among many campaign workers to be wired. Here's the text of the post, followed by a rebuttal that raises more questions than it answers:

"I have contacts within the Republican Party. I was told by Scott Zale, a Repulican operative in eastern Tennessee that he knows it to be a fact that Bush was wired. He said that within the Bush campaign, there are certain mid-level staffers that have leaked this tidbit because it was just "too fantastic to ignore."

Zale told me that the transmission device is popular with other high profile officials in the Bush administration. It helps everybody stay "on message." Zale said that Bush was only fed ready responses to just certain types of questions. He didn't know which questions those were but admitted that Bush just sounded(to him)to be more articulate at certain "oportune" times.

Zale confided that he was told that the president wore a loose fitting jacket during both debates. The device protuded because Bush has a tendency to hunch over and shrug his shoulders a lot.

This is a true story as it was told to me. If you want to know more, please contact Scott Zale at the Bush-Cheney campaign headquarters in Knoxville, Tn. Thanks."


IsBushWired called Bush-Cheney in Knoxville and confirmed that a Scott Zale was known there, though the woman who answered the phone said, "he's hardly ever here. He has a day job."

Meanwhile,somebody posting as "Scott Zale" repliedon the portlandindymedia site, under the headline "Scott Zale speaks for himself":

Please shut down this blog. I was informed this morning by the national editor of the Knoxville Times that my name was invoked by a man named "Brad Menfil" in regards to this out-of-control story.

It is true that I work for Bush-Cheney here in Tennessee. My office is in Gatlinburg, not Knoxville. Although I do happen to work at least two days a week in Knoxville. I am a staff accountant and one of my duties is to process local contributions. As part of that duty, I have to wire funds to the national committee in Washington D.C. So I do have national Republican contacts and have heard many things.

"Brad" is not his real name but I suspect he is or may be my counterpart in the Washington collections office. He has probably been to Tennessee about 15 times in the last 7 weeks, though he does not live here. I won't give his real name (even though he felt it was necessary to give mine).

The Knoxville Times called me at 6am this morning asking me to confirm or deny the "Bush is Wired" story they read here at Portland IMC. My immediate response was, "What is the Portland IMC?" and I then I issued a "no comment". Other than that, I did say that "Brad Menfil" is not a real person.

Please stop speculating about this. Our president is a great man and can only get hurt by this. I suspect this isn't going to go away and I regret anything that I said to "Brad" that may contribute to downfall of a great man and president.

Please drop this for the good of our country. We have bigger problems and should not be distracted by matters that don't ultimately determine the measure of an honest man. I want to say that the right answers are what matter most, not whether or not those answers were "fed" my someone else. President Bush is a good messenger regardless.

Thanks, Scott Zale, Senior Staff Accountant, Bush-Cheney Tennessee.


The person writing as "Brad Menfil" then posted back to Portland Indymedia:
"Scott Zale is right, "Brad Menfil" is not my real name and I didn't hear this story from him, he heard it from me. Sorry Scott.
I do work for Bush-Cheney and I can olny say that the substance of my first posting is correct, even though I used a fake name. I hope everybody understands why I would do this. I got a call from Scott this morning (actually, about 10 minutes ago). He said that he had been contacted by ABC and Fox after his own posting. I don't share his belief that ignoring this would be good for the country. I'm sorry I involved Scott and didn't have enough courage to use my real name. I hope the truth gets out and Scott is absolved.
Thanks for reading this, "Brad Menfil."


IsBushWired looked at the Knoxville Times online. It didn't look at all like a real newspaper, as Glenn Ward, editor of The South Knoxville and Seymour Times Sentinel confirmed. "I've never heard of it," he said. Looking at the website, he agreed that it seemed to be a lot of clippings taken off news wires. So, who called Mr. Zale at 6 in the morning? Or did anybody call Scott Zale at all? Scott Zale seems to exist, but who can be sure? Maybe somebody else used his name to write to Portland Indymedia.

Update: Webmeisters, thanks for your work in digging up the provenance of the Knoxville Times site; many of you reported that it was created 8/19/2003 in Australia by a John Mcevoy, who owns a company Mainstream Capital EC, headquartered in Manama, Bahrain, with offices in Sydney, Australia. A PRWeb July press release announced it was launching a new search engine called 100.com.

Curiously, when I first looked at the Knoxville Times site Monday afternoon, there was no masthead, no information about ownership, not even an email address or the word "Tennessee" in the title. Following my posting about the "fake" newspaper Monday afternoon, the site added a box explaining, "The Knoxville Times is essentially a local Knoxville newspaper, but with a national and international perspective....The biggest advantage we have is that we are an online newspaper, which means we are constantly refreshing our stories as more and more information comes to hand."

The lead story, however, about environmentalist protestors at a local coal company exective's home in West Knoxville Sunday night, is not a story at all, but a link to a posting about the action by the protestors at an anarchist website, www.infoshop.org.

The "newspaper" box goes on: "We like to think if you're looking for breaking news out of Knoxville, Tennessee, the United States, or the world, you'll look for it first at the Knoxville Times."

Hmmm. I don't think so. It's a genuinely weird front for something or other. Who is John McEvoy, anyway, and who's the editor?

The Zale letter also reads in part like an official Bush-Cheney production, whereas "Brad Menfil's" second letter sounds faintly genuine -- if there's a real person in any of this. But I wouldn't bet on it. It could all be fiction cooked up by Karl Rove and Co. We won't waste any more time on it unless a credible source gets in touch with us with a great deal of information that checks out.

Incidentally, legit editor Glenn Ward said his own newspaper, which can be Googled (though they don't have a web site yet) has been reporting lately on the recent shutdown -- for no obvious reason, he said -- by the FCC with "heavy FBI involvement" of a tiny, 100-watt unlicensed radio station in the area that had been reporting critically on local matters, including the federal TVA project. )

582 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello,

I am a TV journalist from Britain and I was wondering exactly the same thing a few weeks back. When I'm spoke at through my earpiece live on TV, I have the same behavioural response - slight pause, strange eye movements (I'm pretty new).

You have to be very well trained not to shift your eyes a bit when someone is talking at you through the earpiece.

Secondly - and clearly this is not proof - but it might be worthwhile getting in touch with the producers of 24 (very big in the UK). In the third series, episode 5 or 6, they included a fictional debate between President Palmer and the challenger. Palmer was wired with an invisible earpiece, thrugh which Jack Bauer told him about an imminent threat. Maybe this is just life imitating art. Or maybe they were trying to make a point. Worth asking about.

11:16 AM  
Anonymous said...

Of course Bush is wired. Karl Rove doesn't want a repeat of the morning of 9/11/01 when W didn't know that he should take charge upon learning America was under attack.

11:23 AM  
Anonymous said...

This country needs another 527 group to splash hi-definition pictures of bush's hump all over the major networks to get this story out of the blogs and into the 24 hour news channels. Maybe it could be called Microphone Manufacturers for Truth ... The AP picture itself is the most convincing part of this story I have seen.

11:31 AM  
Anonymous said...

I think bush was wired. everyone knows his suits are tailor made and have no puckering! Puleaze! Check out my modern art on ebay, member name artemizzia! Thanks! :)

11:35 AM  
Anonymous said...

You all crack me up with your weird theories. I may be just another nieve 17 year old, but even IF Bush was wired, would it really matter? In most peoples opinions he lost the debate anyway, so teh question should not be "Was he wired?" as much as "Did he fire his aides?".

11:44 AM  
Anonymous said...

Intersting that everyone is anonymous. Maybe we are all justifiably concerned with the implementation of the Patriot Act as it applies to those who would criticize Bush.

All Bush needs to do is provide a "credible" explanation and maybe the subject would disappear.

The dazed look, which one poster suggested was him concentrating on the little voice in his head (I wonder how he could stand the echo), is a natural look for him when the s*** eating grin is not in place.

50-100 million qualified men/women in this country and this is what we ended up with.

God (or your chosen source of guidance) help us all.

11:46 AM  
Anonymous said...

This is something that Mr. Bush should answer to. Let's not just talk amongst ourselves. Let us write emails, make phone calls and write letters to the debate commission and the media to call for an answer....especially before the next debate. Let's not delay!

11:53 AM  
Anonymous said...

get real!! it's just a wrinkle and a shadow!!!!

11:56 AM  
Anonymous said...

It is definately not a pucker. There is some sort of device under his jacket. If he had performed better during the debate I might agree that he was channeling Karl Rove and/or Dick Cheney but he did not do well. It makes me wonder if it could be some sort of medical monitoring device like a heart monitor (that would explain the box and the wire). If it is a medical device he would not want that getting out since it would make him appear weak. (And also make us look closer at Mr. Cheney to see if we want him to be president) He also kept fidgeting with the front of his jacket in the 2nd debate (did he move the box to the front). If anyone has time to go through pictures of Bush with his back turned it would be interesting to know if he is wearing the box at any other time.
An additional note: he has fallen on numerous occasions, some of them causing injury, which could also be caused by some medical conditions.

12:00 PM  
Anonymous said...

Relax... it's just an 8-track player and he's listening to the soundtrack of "This Land" from th JibJab cartoon.

12:14 PM  
Anonymous said...

Look at this clip from:

members.cox.net/unmarked/002.wmv

Windows Media Player works for me. If you watch closely, about the time he says ...people in the United States.." he will adjust his jacket with his left hand. You will see a dark thin line between his jacket and his tie. Is this a wire that would be part of a wired setup?

You decide.

12:17 PM  
Anonymous said...

PS: this refers to the post re the film clip where Bush adjusts his tie. This is from the second debate on Friday, not the first.

12:20 PM  
Anonymous said...

I think it's very possible Bush is wired. During the first debate when Bush was hunched over the podium, I noticed the square lump on his back. I just figured it was a remote microphone put on him by the network in case his podium mike went out. If it wasn't, then it's pretty damn suspicious. I also noticed during the second debate that Bush kept sticking his left hand into his jacket. It looked weird because he obviously wasn't adjusting the seam of his jacket because his hand went in too far. It could be, though, that he was fiddling with the volume or reception. If this is true and the Dems are smart they won't push this. They'll just jam the receiver during the next debate and watch Bush come apart live in front of a national audience.

12:28 PM  
Jack B said...

The fact that Kerry is supposedly ahead in the polls shows just what a bunch of twits America is filled with and this whole debate about Bush being wired proves it. Immediately after the debate President Bush was surrounded by dozens of people shaking his hands, patting him on the back, and so forth. Surely if there was a "box" strapped to his back one of those people would have felt or seen it and do you really think he'd let anyone get that close to him if he was? Kerry may have style, but that won't convince a child-killing terrorist not to attack us. It's much better to have a backbone than a nice suite and perfect hair. What the hell is wrong with this pathetic, superficial nation?

12:30 PM  
Anonymous said...

You paranoid morons. Don't any of you have enough gray matter in your heads to realize that the President of the United States wears body armor during public appearances, and the supposed shape you are all in a tizzy over is exactly where you would find an additional armor plate to protect the spinal cord. If the President was wearing a wire, don't you think that the reciever would be number one, far smaller... And number two, hidden down at the waist where the suit jacket would better conceal it. Get a grip people. If you want Kerry to win so badly, try arguing positions instead of this idiotic blather.

12:32 PM  
Anonymous said...

To Jack B. who said: "What the hell is wrong with this pathetic, superficial nation?"

Well said, Jack. What is wrong with this pathetic superficial nation is that it let George Bush mislead them in Iraq and took them to the cleaners economically, and they may still give him another four years.

Talk about innocent children being killed, what the heck do you think is happening in the streets or Iraq right now?

Rather than go after Al Qaeda, Bush went after the Bush family nemesis, Saddam. The result is that Iraq is now the number one breeding site for new terrorists.

12:37 PM  
Anonymous said...

After the first debate a number of my co-workers said it looked like the normally super-fit Bush had developed "osteoporosis" since the Republican Convention.

It's not just the box bulge, it's the new dowagers hump posture that's a puzzle. Question for techies and 24 hour news anchors: When people are wired do their necks slip into their suits for comfort?

12:37 PM  
Anonymous said...

To Jack B. who said: "What the hell is wrong with this pathetic, superficial nation?"

Well said, Jack. What is wrong with this pathetic superficial nation is that it let George Bush mislead them in Iraq and took them to the cleaners economically, and they may still give him another four years.

Talk about innocent children being killed, what the heck do you think is happening in the streets or Iraq right now?

Rather than go after Al Qaeda, Bush went after the Bush family nemesis, Saddam. The result is that Iraq is now the number one breeding site for new terrorists.

12:37 PM  
Anonymous said...

There may be another answer for all this. Here's a paragraph from the new issue of Newsweek, out today:
"In Minnesota, officials at the state's Division of Homeland Security are worried about another kind of election threat. The agency recently issued a flier telling poll workers how to spot a "homicide bomber" in the line. Among the things to look for: "Unusual shapes or bulges protruding from a person's mid-section" and "May be seen praying fervently to himself/herself, giving the appearance of whispering to someone."

12:39 PM  
Anonymous said...

If Bush was wired during both debates, there is a simple explanation for a lump on his back in the first one and adjusting his jacket from the front in the second debate. Bush gave a terrible performance during the first debate. Remember, though, that in the first 30 minutes he was fine. Suddenly, he came apart. What if the receiver cut out during the debate because it was on his back (coat was so tight against his back that maybe it switched off the receiver or the receiver needed an adjustment and Bush couldn't get to it). This would help explain his fumbling performance, since he didn't bother practicing before the debate. By the second debate, the receiver is in his coat pocket where Bush can adjust it if need be.

12:41 PM  
Red7Eric said...

'Anonymous' writes: "You paranoid morons. Don't any of you have enough gray matter in your heads to realize that the President of the United States wears body armor during public appearances, and the supposed shape you are all in a tizzy over is exactly where you would find an additional armor plate to protect the spinal cord."

Actually, that was one of the questions that journalists put to the White House. Bush's aides say that he wasn't wearing a bulletproof vest. Besides, now that Kerry is a nominee, he's getting Secret Service protection too -- and would likely be wearing the same gear as Dubya. Try again.

12:43 PM  
Anonymous said...

Are you people serious? I'm not sure that i've ever witnessed such a desperate group of people trying to remove someone from office. As a political moderate who has voted for both parties, it's quite amazing to me that John Kerry may win when nobody knows what the heck he stands for. Do any of you actually know the issues or is it a matter of removing Bush without thought about the consequences?

How quickly we forget how terrible September 11th was and how easy it is to overlook that another attack has not happened since on U.S. soil...is everyone confident that John Kerry will supply the same protection? I'm a pro-choice, anti-death penalty, environmentalist...sounds liberal doesn't it? But I could never associate myself with the passionate, yet blind and wrongly directed group of people that will say and do anything to remove Bush. This constant search for any angle to attack is ugly and it's frankly hurting the political system far more than helping. Let's try and be a model for the peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan who are trying hold democratic elections. Let's show them that we can elect a president without the mud-slinging desperate b.s. tactics I am seeing in this election.

Those of you who can think of nothing better than to rack your brains over this issue should move on, read a book, go for a walk, volunteer somewhere, please do something....I'm sorry that this is negative and sounds bitter, but I am getting bitter. All of you that read this can laugh and brush off my words, but somebody needs to take a stance for clear thought. Actually, now i'm mad that I spent this much energy on the topic...time to take my own advice and get off the soapbox.

ps. Send both political parties a message and vote Nader. Bush may not be the smartest and most savvy, and John Kerry is way too rich to really understand 99% of the people of this country (owning 7 houses doesn't make me feel like he understands my needs), but Nader at least isn't in the back pocket of the special interest groups. Think about it.

12:50 PM  
Anonymous said...

you are a shit head and you spend way to much time on this "blog". you are a sorry excuse for an american and if john kerry is elected president i hope that osama bin laden decides to plan another attack and blows your head off.

12:50 PM  
Anonymous said...

I'm posting anonymously because I don't need any more crap filling up my e-mail box. This is the dumbest most ignorant statements I have ever heard! You should all be ashamed with yourselves!

12:53 PM  
Anonymous said...

After some computer enhanced analysis it's become quite clear what's going on here:

http://www.ivtp.com/denial2.gif

12:56 PM  
Anonymous said...

Just listening to how Bush spoke (at the debate and on several other public occasions) it seemed exactly like he was wearing a wire. It sounded like he was just being fed responses and repeating them coldly as if reading from a book - not really answering a person or at least in a semi personal way.

I for one think he's been wired for years.

12:58 PM  
NBachers said...

Here's something to pay attention to: There's a device called a Neurophone which enables you to hear by placing a couple of little disks anywhere on your skin! I know, because I've got one- it's a small box, like the one alledgedly seen under Bush's suit coat. There are little 1" disks like Walkman headphones. You can place them against your skin anywhere on your body and your inner ear hears them. You can input music or voice or any kind of sound. Check out http://www.phisciences.com for a description.

1:00 PM  
Anonymous said...

Regarding HUMPGATE:

Are any of the news channels running this story?

1:02 PM  
Anonymous said...

At about 39 minutes into the first debate Bush flips his notebook over and you can see in the camera some of the mad scrawling that is on his notepad. Large letters, scribbles, but nothing I can completely make out, except maybe the word "Iraq" underlined twice. What kind of scrawl is it on those pages?

1:05 PM  
Anonymous said...

You people have got to be the dumbest group that I have ever came across. What are you all talking about? Who is the guy that said instead of catching Al Queda, we caught Saddam. Yeah, and so what we caught Saddam. Every other president of the United States has tried to catch this evil man, and Bush has. Stop being so petty and looking for some stupid reason to hate Bush. Yeah he has sent many military members to war, but that is what they signed up for. If they thought being in the military was going to be an easy ride then they shouldn't have enlisted. God bless our troops, and I would be devasted if my husband had to go, but I know that he is in the military to defend our country and you morons. If we pulled our troops out of Iraq now we would be attacked big time by terrorists. You rock Bush, I hope you kick Kerry's a**.

1:09 PM  
Anonymous said...

If it turns out to be true that the President of the United States cheated during the debates by being prompted by an outside source he will have betrayed every Republican who trusted him to be an honorable man as well as all U.S.citizens. If this dishonorable act by President Bush is proven to be true he will have succeeded in makeing America the laughing stock of the World because we are supposed to be providing an example for all others to follow.

I am a 78 year old lifelong Democrat and will be voting for John Kerry, but. for the good of the Country and for all of those who had faith in President Bush I honestly hope there is a clear explaination for what appears to be someone dealing from the bottom of the deck

1:10 PM  
Anonymous said...

Are there any high resolution videos of the debate? I'd like to see more than just the picture that was posted.

1:17 PM  
BDGSF said...

Bravo on getting the mention in the AP story! Regardless of whether or not Bush was actuallly wired — and mounting evidence shows that he may have been — this misleader-in-chief obviously needs all the help he can get in order to distract the American public from the Wrong policies he has put into place for the benefit of his corporate-welfare fat-cat friends.

It's about time Bush is unmasked for the fraud that he is.

Please see "America Is A Liberal Concept" at http://brunocerous.blogspot.com for more ways in which he's just plain WRONG.

"Imagine no liberals: The Taliban did."

1:24 PM  
Anonymous said...

I love the indignant responses from the Stepford Wives-like Bush lovers. Another site, www.mysterybulge.com has more on this subject - I'm sure there are other sites out there as well (in addition to the bloggers).

1:35 PM  
Anonymous said...

Do you mean he's wired, as in wearing electronic devices or wired, as in under the influence of chemical stimulants? From where I sat watching the last debate, both statements appeared to be accurate.

1:37 PM  
Anonymous said...

Yesterday if you typed 'is bush wired' into a google news search you only got 12 articles. today over 630.

the server hosting this site is running at or near maximum capacity. has been for several days. This story went from one blog created 5 days ago to nytimes, washington post, bbc, reuters, associated press...all running stories in the last 48 hours.

so you republicans with your aggressive posts and 'how dare you question the president' just realize...

this snowball is turning into a news avalanche.

When 600+ articles are written in 24 hours about it you can't call it an 'internet conspiracy' anymore. This IS the global credibility test. This is about trust and deception.

will you continue to defend Bush through 'audiogate'?

1:43 PM  
Anonymous said...

Uh, correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't the first debate the one Bush the worst in? If he's boxed up, why weren't they 'feeding' him new lines? Maybe John Kerry's people were blocking the transmission. God, you people are freaking moronic.

1:50 PM  
Anonymous said...

Funny. When you have CBS backpedalling on the Bush National Guard records, and then you have the poster above telling me that the press writing lots of stories about the transmitter, you expect me to believe the press? Many stories does not make it the truth...

1:53 PM  
Eduardo Cicarino said...

I'm a brazilian student.
I think Bush is a false man, he does everything to get the things he wants, and the problem is these things are bad for the world.
He's stupid and selfish.I'm very worried about this election because if Bush win irregularly again the world probably will not support it!!!

2:04 PM  
Anonymous said...

Is Rove constipated?
I haven't seen his post, yet.

2:09 PM  
Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
you are a shit head and you spend way to much time on this "blog". you are a sorry excuse for an american and if john kerry is elected president i hope that osama bin laden decides to plan another attack and blows your head off


Why do so many people think that voting for Bush will protect them from another terrorist attack? What has he done to prove that he can protect us better than Kerry? It was during Bush's office that 9/11 occurred, in case some of you have forgotten. He didn't stop Osama Bin Laden then, did he? What is it that Bush has done for this country that makes him such a good president?

I don't really like Kerry, but he's a heckuva lot better than Bush. I would rather vote Nader, but I really don't think he has a chance to win. Why is it that in this supposed Democratic nation, you can only have political influence if you are 'friends' w/ big business?

I

2:11 PM  
Anonymous said...

It is always a pleasure to see when something hits a nerve. If the only explanation exonerating GWB offered by his campaign remains a pucker in his coat, then it seems quite reasonable for the blogosphere to use their collective abilities to figure it out and push hard for a more credible explanation and/or an admission. Isn't that what led to a reexamination of the CBS documents? As disappointed as many were that Rather then retracted that part of the story, it is important that this happened so that the rest of the story (Bush AWOL, etc.) was left intact. Same here. If Bush is cheating, that certainly would hurt him. However, lying and cheating is even worse, no? Even just lying is pretty bad, although that doesn't seem to bother some people... Good luck to the blogs and their readers. No matter what the explanation, it is worth knowing what it is.

2:12 PM  
Anonymous said...

it just goes to show it doesn't matter how well crafted the statements whispered into your ear are if the man delivering the statement is, according to some standardized test results, technically retarded.

The Debate In One Very Bad Limerick:

Last night, Bush had a little more fizz.
Iraq's not a mess, so he says.
He said, if he could,
He'd give us some wood,
But he's fucked us enough as it is.

2:14 PM  
Anonymous said...

I am a 14 year old reading about your political views and opinions. I have also just watched the movie Farhenheit 9/11. I do not agree or disagree with your views because, quite frankly, I'm a Canadian and could care less what goes on over there. Have fun guys.

2:25 PM  
Anonymous said...

I am a 14 year old reading about your political views and opinions. I have also just watched the movie Farhenheit 9/11. I do not agree or disagree with your views because, quite frankly, I'm a Canadian and could care less about what goes on over there. Have fun with your runaway politics guys! :D

2:26 PM  
Anonymous said...

No earpiece is needed. Bone conductivity will conduct the sound up his spine to his skull. That's how Rove can say Bush had no audio prompting - because it was done by bone conductivity.

2:26 PM  
Anonymous said...

i think you people are insane,why do you care so much if bush is wired? seriously you are just looking for dumb reasons to put him down, and if your going for kerry, maybe you should ask him what his plan really is?? im pretty sure all he knows how to do is critisize a perfectly good president and say When im president, this is my plan..and he never tells us his plan, he just goes back to all he knows how to do, wrongfully accuse people. so aucutally maybe you guys should for real wake up.

2:30 PM  
Anonymous said...

Upthread, someone asked if the network media has been giving this issue any attention. I don't watch that much TV but this morning I did catch the tail-end of the Stephanopolous show. He ran a clip showing the now-famous bulge in Bush's back but claimed that he, Stenphanopolous, could not guess what it was.

So yes, the broadcast media are certainly aware but they are treating this with arm's length circumspection. They are in fact being led by the blogs.

"oracle"

2:33 PM  
Joshua said...

you guys are crazy. the real news is kerry's cheat sheet available to view at:

http://www.zombietime.com/kerry_at_first_debate/

or do posts like this get deleted?

joshua

2:38 PM  
Anonymous said...

Recently Bush has acquired a strange awkward gate, moving as if his diaper was hanging too low and he was keeping his legs apart to avoid contacting it. Whazzat? Hip dysplasia? Something gone wrong in the crotch area? Or is the power pack taped on there?

2:39 PM  
Anonymous said...

joshua

2:41 PM  
Anonymous said...

There are a lot of outraged friends of Bush posting here expressing anger at people for trying to follow this "bulge" issue to its conclusions. Their anger fails to recognize that this sort of thing, if true, is part of the old Bush pattern of operating on the edge of legality, and sometimes crossing it.

His tour of duty in the Guard, his insider selling of Harkin stock, the hanky panky in Florida in 2000, and most grievously, his lying to get us into the war in Iraq-- these are all part of the Bush modus operandi. It is this kind of odorous reputation following Bush that is giving energy to this story. The man cannot be trusted.

2:41 PM  
Anonymous said...

joshua
that wasn't a cheat sheet, it was a pen. kerry's campaign said taking it out of his pocket was technically a violation but chalked it up to a nervous habit.

2:42 PM  
Anonymous said...

I just stumbled to this site while reading the news. The photo does seem to indicate Bush has something underneath his suit. If it's a tailoring problem, then maybe Bush needs to switch tailors. If Bush is wired...hmm...I thought it was a debate between Bush and Kerry, not Bush and company vs. Kerry. It would not be a fair debate, and even if Bush is my man I would not want that. I am Canadian and thus watch 'As the American Election Turns' with some interest. Incidentally I do notice those pro-Bush comments tend to go for name-calling rather than logical and well-thought out responses. Is that typical of Bush supporters?

2:43 PM  
Anonymous said...

THIS IS FOR THE SITE OWNER SINCE EMAILS I TRY TO SEND HIM IN REPLY ARE BOUNCING:

oh! hahaha! I understand what yuo mean. There was never any site on www.bushiswired.com... when I found isbushwired, I liked it so much I just thought I'd register www.bushiswired.com ... like, an affirmative statement. I can redirect it to you if you like.
P.S. I hate bush too. email me and all mail to you is bouncing when I try to reply.

2:45 PM  
Anonymous said...

The suit cost $8000 using $1000/yd fabric made by the french tailor who has created suits for every president since LBJ. And since this 'hump/wrinkle/fold' is so strange and noticable don't you think if it was a stitching error the tailor wouldn't have let it go out to be seen by 60 million people?

2:47 PM  
Anonymous said...

The suit cost $8000 using $1000/yd fabric made by the french tailor who has created suits for every president since LBJ. And since this 'hump/wrinkle/fold' is so strange and noticable don't you think if it was a stitching error the tailor wouldn't have let it go out to be seen by 60 million people?

2:47 PM  
Anonymous said...

This just keeps getting better and better for all of us who've watched this nitwit weasel his way through the most bold-faced deceptions while his troglodyte ditto-head followers buy it all hook, line & sinker. First of all, his performance was terrible even if he had it (which is pretty pathetic).

That being said, I think there were several incidents during the debate where he looked more like a correspondent in the field reporting on a breaking story than a sitting head of state answering pre-screened questions. I just don't know how to explain that. I mean, the guy murders words when he's not in the middle of one of his live infomercials, we all know that...but nothing explains the extended pauses and the dodgy eyes that were seen several times during the debate.

Further than this, while the box shape may be explainable, the obvious wire-shaped hump leading to the right side of his neck leads me to believe that this is a plausible story that the media finally needs to at least look into beyond just doing the usual: Asking campaign officials about it and printing their responses as the authority while sources that contradict the party line go unquoted and have their beliefs run down with a few pithy and indescriptive phrases labelled under "but skeptics aren't so sure" or "many believe the opposite." It's time for the bloggers to hammer this one onto the nightly news in their cities!

I've written CBS Channel 2, Fox, NBC 5, and ABC 7 here in Chicago already and it's time that you all do the same. This so-called strong leader needs to stop getting handled with kid gloves by the media.

Dan S.
Chicago
ps__Don't believe all the total BS from this prevaricator about the draft...this is the big ugly that Bush has to keep under wraps in the days leading up to the election to win. Once he does, it's a blank check to smash his agenda through no matter how unpopular.

2:47 PM  
Anonymous said...

This is so ridiculous - Bush responded too quickly to be getting his words from elsewhere. You people have WAY too much time on your hands. Hope you had fun spending your weekend on Photoshop zooming in on our President's back so you could make stupid accusations that won't effect your life in any way at all. I was out having a good time =) I feel bad for you.

2:48 PM  
Anonymous said...

In a chat-group, somebody recently suggested using the term "Puppetgate" instead of "Wiredgate" to describe this current blogfest. Sounds right to me.

2:50 PM  
Anonymous said...

Oh dear...I thought it was mostly Bush supporters who are fond of name-calling. The fundamental issue of whether the president encumbent is cheating during debate is too important to be side tracked by name-calling. I agree...this should be brought to the attention to the whole country via the media...and let the truth come come out!

2:52 PM  
Anonymous said...

Yes, I agree that the tailor cannot be blamed. Are the Bush reps claiming this too was a wardrobe malfunction?

Lulu

2:53 PM  
Anonymous said...

You have this all wrong. The bulge is not some high tech
transmitter, it's a lithium ion power cell. Bush didn't show up for the first debate, a W-DROID replaced him! It was apparent that Ol' Lurch had no trouble beating the android in their first round. In he second debate, the defective droid was replaced by George W. himself and gave Lurch real competition. The big question...have the bugs been fixed in the W-DROID for the 3rd debate, or will the real George W. make an appearance in Tempe and spar with the socialist leaning Lurch?

2:55 PM  
Anonymous said...

I believe it to be a bullet-proof vest! (The Secret Service requires him to wear the vest in public.) Especially around kooks like the one's thinking the bulge to be a prompter device.

2:57 PM  
Anonymous said...

Question? If President Bush were wired, don't you think he'd have the latest and greatest equipment? I've been in video production for 5 years now and I have wireless mic's that I have people wear and you can't see them at all. There is no way President Bush would have been wearing a receiver that BIG and BULKY. And, there is no way he would have been wearing it on his back. Think about it, if someone like me has access to equipment that can be hidden under a t-shirt, would the President of the United States use something less than what I can get? It was probably body armour, get over it!!

2:57 PM  
Anonymous said...

No doubt Georges Bush is not smart, but I wonder if he would be so stupid to let the world see he carries an electronic receiver on hus his back, the seize of a hamburger! Are there any simular pictures of Clinton's pants after he met Monica Lewinsky?
Sorry, but in Europe we laugh at these kind of presumptions. Nail Bush on principles, not on trival details.

3:01 PM  
Anonymous said...

Dan S,

I emailed CNN, two anchors at MSNBC and the NY stations. But they need to hear from more viewers and put a real reporter on it instead of their lazy-ass phoning around to reps for comments.

I think they're still intimidated by the Rather thing.

Can somebody get thru to the Air America Radio site? It crashes my computer (my browser's fault). Franken needs to blast off on this, raise some questions.

Lulu

3:03 PM  
Anonymous said...

There are at least two other occasions when Bush was being prompted via an earpiece. I recall these:

The day or two after the 2000 election when Gore had rescinded his acceptance of Bush's win. Bush has a press conference in Texas when he was obviously being prompted. He looked hung over that day.

At Bush's press conference right before the war when he was delivering Saddam an ultimatum. He did not read from notes -- he was being prompted from somewhere else.

3:05 PM  
Anonymous said...

All this talk of audio prompting got me wondering: Is there any definitive proof that Bush can read? There's a funny photo of him "reading" a book with a young schoolgirl, where she's actually doing the reading from her book while Bush is holding his book upside down (you'd think he'd at least notice the pictures don't work that way). Anyway, my husband said that my musings were ridiculous because, of course, Bush reads from teleprompters when he gives a State of the Union Address or something. But has he really been reading the teleprompters or just pretended to while having the lines read to him? Food for thought...the President may actually be a functional illiterate.

3:12 PM  
Anonymous said...

everybody gets what they deserve!
on the other hand: even a european like me does not want america to suffer from a chimp being president

3:20 PM  
misanthropologist said...

The New Yorker's recent profile of Georges de Paris (9/27/04) should remove any doubt that one of his hand-crafted jackets was poorly made or fit Bush too snugly. Bush likes a sturdy wool that hides wrinkles and wires -- "The President won't wear anything less robust than Super 100." Before measurements are taken, de Paris "will inquire whether the customer has any special needs: certain men may need a hidden pocket for cash, for instance; a diamond dealer may need a zippered pocket for diamonds; some customers need extra room for a gun." Reagan was de Paris's favorite Presidential customer, but W. "runs a close second. 'So nice! So friendly!' de Paris says of Bush, whom he sees sometimes three times a week, at the White House, for fittings."

3:23 PM  
Anonymous said...

Whether he was physically wired or not during the first debate, it seems apparent to me that Bush was physiologically wired during the second. His performance was nothing short of manic. He couldn't wait to jump out of his seat at the slightest perceived provocation (for Bush that would be something on the order of lint on Kerry's lapel). Further, at least one close-up of the president showed his eyes shifting rapidly from side-to-side in their sockets. If I met someone on the street acting like Bush, my first thought would be that that person was stoned.
Is it just me?

3:26 PM  
Anonymous said...

You people are liberal nut jobs. Get a life,PLEASE.

3:36 PM  
Anonymous said...

What pisses me off is that this story is "tailor made" (pun fully intended) for Drudge-- who was all over the "Kerry crib note story-- and yet he's had (so far, at least) nary a single word about it on his web site.

3:40 PM  
Anonymous said...

you people need to get a hobby or something. You need something to do. In other words, GET A LIFE>

3:41 PM  
Anonymous said...

I think Bush is wired, but I dont think he has some kind of wired device on his back. With the technology we have today, why would it be so big? He probably has something in his pocket or in the inside of his jacket. In my opinion he did terrible in the first debate, and did a little better in the one on friday. The republicans might have made him wear it because they didt want him to sound like a idiot again?

Usually when he talkes, its like he dosent know what to say. He's always like 'uhhh' or 'ummm' or has a big break between words. If you didnt notice, he didnt seem to have that problem during the last debate. I think someone was telling him what to say.

I may just be some 15 year old kid, but I know what's going on with the election and the war. Personally, if i had to vote, I would sit in jail before voting for Bush.

3:47 PM  
Anonymous said...

hey
this is ridiculous and the mere fact that you (by "you" i obviosuly mean whoover started this crap site) have the time to start a website based on this just says to the world that you're a loser :) find something productive to do
and hey remember when president's wore bullet-proof vests so that they wouldn't die if shot........that's obviously what the damn "bulge" is...it's called common sense you should buy some
why are you so anti-bush anyway could it be that you're just another loser-poser following the oh so cool trend of being liberal just for the sake of the label and have no idea what bush is all about because you're brain-washed by what is "cool"
ugh get over yourself
jen-yale '08

3:50 PM  
Anonymous said...

There is no way Bush was not wearing body armor. First, everyone and their mother was screened before entering the theatre to watch the first debate. Second, there was that 30 some-odd page contract that Bush and Kerry signed. If Bush was wearing body armor, he would've been sweating his ass off and would have wanted a lower temperature in the theatre as was written in the contract.

3:54 PM  
Anonymous said...

While watching the debate, I noticed that Bush looked like he had hair in his ears, and I thought that it was strange because he would of been better groomed than that, so I thought it might of been a shadow, I looked at Kerry and I did'nt see that, maybe it was not shaved off to conseal an earpiece?

3:54 PM  
Anonymous said...

I tried to make my own suit jackets pucker like that. They won't do it. But my suits aren't tailor-made. Can anyone who knows something about expensive suits address de Paris' explanation?

3:55 PM  
Anonymous said...

"why are you so anti-bush anyway could it be that you're just another loser-poser following the oh so cool trend of being liberal just for the sake of the label and have no idea what bush is all about because you're brain-washed by what is "cool"
ugh get over yourself"

That's BS! I go to a private christian school and everyone in my class is a republican. When I told people, including my history teacher, they just laugh at me and call me a loser. So why would i be anti-bush to be cool?

Personally i think the christians that vote for bush do so just because they're brain washed by churches and because bush says he's a christian man, prays, is against gay marriage, and against abortion. That's all important, but i think the economy and the war is more important.

3:57 PM  
Anonymous said...

Maybe the guy on the other end of earpiece should run for president instead of the puppet!

4:03 PM  
Bill O'Reilly said...

Shaaddup! Just Shaaddup!

4:08 PM  
Anonymous said...

George Bush, by all accounts perfomred poorly during the first debate, for anyone to seriously consider that he was wired and being prompted is completly stupid.

It is bad enough that you denouce Bush for "lying" about Iraq, when both Clinton and the Democratic leadership thought that there were WMD in Iraq. All those who are criticizing Bush for going into Iraq and not finding WMD (who forget the mass graves and the crimes against humanity that the Butcher of Baghadad is guilty of)would be the first ones to call for his impeachment if he had done nothing and terrorist with WMD supplied by Saddam had attacked us.

The icing on the cake is the moronic woman who thinks Bush can't read. He was a successful business man prior to being govenor of Texas and President.

To pathetic Dan who wants us all to call the media to have them go after this story, GET REAL. If the meida smelled blood in the water, if there was a real story behind this, they wouldn't need bone heads like Dan to tell them to go after the story.

If you people want to attack Bush do so on his record

4:26 PM  
Anonymous said...

Bozo's:
First to the "person" who does television in the UK and recognizes familiar eye movements, you are a Deer in the Headlights and must just SUCK! I am in televison too, and we wear plenty of communication devices through which people can convey messages, and NONE of them are mounted between the shoulder blades. Just be logical. Why would such a mystery device be mounted there? So it could plug into the cable surgically implanted in the president's spine? People, I suggest you follow Ted Kazinski's lead and come out of your cabins. Return to reality. As an earlier poster mention, these types of communcation devices are always in the small of the back, where they aren't seen. For example, mounted on the belt in back. Folks, get a clue! I mean really. Instead of being so weird, just vote in November and then shut up. Wait, if the election doesn't go your way, there will surely have some massive conspiracy. I hope Oliver Stone is ready.

4:33 PM  
Anonymous said...

Notice how many flaming Republican posts have started appearing - each using words like "moronic", "bonehead", "loser" etc.?

They all sound like they're being written by the same person.

My guess is that the Bush campaign has tapped some intern with the task of loading up this site with dissention.

Nice job intern - if you do a good job, maybe they'll give you a promotion to a real staff position!

4:35 PM  
Anonymous said...

posts claiming that if bush was wired he would have done a better job of it; i.e. it would have been more inconspicuous, some tiny 007 device created by the cia that is dramatically smaller than the super-expensive spyware stuff available in the private sector... i remain skeptical. r&d has never been the cia's strong suit. basically they just buy the technology from private companies and then slap a legal restrainer on it like 'can be purchased for gov or law enforcement only' or 'not for export' etc.

it is most likely that if bush wanted to do this they would just buy the best one available commercially from a private company. after all, they don't care what it costs and there's no paper trail if they don't have to develop it in-house

and when was the last time you bought a laptop designed by the government?

and a device like that would be great if you wanted to put your candidate up in front of the press corps for an hour without notes and and field complex questions because there isn't a 2 min time limit and it allows him the appearance of knowing peoples names, understanding relevant issues...apparently it's not great if you have a debate yoda like john kerry who can argue circles around bush in real time without a crew of handlers trying to script a response and transmit it. and john kerry already knows how to pronounce all the words he plans on using.

4:39 PM  
Anonymous said...

Personally, I don't care what is inside Bush's ear or jacket, what really worries and frightens me is what is inside his head!! I'm hoping and praying that you Americans are aware of what to do with this men (GET RID OF HIM!!), not only for your sake, but for the world's sake. IT IS SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE THAT THE WHOLE WORLD IS WRONG AND THAT LESS THAN 50% OF AMERICANS VOTERS ARE RIGHT!! Congratulations for the initiative! Regards to all, Daniel (Recife/Brasil)

4:40 PM  
Anonymous said...

I HATE YOU ALL

4:44 PM  
Anonymous said...

anonymous said
"I HATE YOU ALL"

is that the veep?

I thought you loved us, Cheney. Particularly our supple young organs.

4:47 PM  
Anonymous said...

If you go to this site http://video.msn.com/video/p.htm you can watch the debate. Play the clip where Bush talks about the draft, 5:46 into the clip you can see the wire its under his tie.

4:54 PM  
Anonymous said...

IGNORANT PEOPLE!
For crying out loud, dont you think we have better technology than this bumpy crap!!!!
SS

P.S. "If anything" the wires are under the skin!
Sleep well morons.

4:54 PM  
Anonymous said...

I am no Bush fan but I am not willing to swallow this one guys. Who would fit a 'hidden' device to the protruding round of a mans back? Spend your time doing something more constructive like jerking off.

4:59 PM  
Said said...

Is it me or does "the bulge" from the first debate resemble the Gilette Mach 3 razor complete with the storage case?

5:11 PM  
Anonymous said...

Its called a backbone. If you look on Kerry's back you'll see a yellow stripe!

5:15 PM  
Anonymous said...

Who really cares, big freakin deal for what ever he has or does not have. This web site is just for those who have nothing better to do. As i see it this probably wont make it to print anyhow. so that makes this web site for Democrats. With all the troubles in the world today, it amazes me how something as stupid and unconfirmed can draw so much attention.

5:17 PM  
Anonymous said...

Go to this site http://video.msn.com/video/p.htm bring up the debate its broken down into clips play the one about the draft, 1:50 into you can see the wire its under his tie and he exposes it briefly.

5:25 PM  
Anonymous said...

Look at Bush at the end of the first debate, when he is greeting his family. He looks considerably thinner at the waist than he looks during the second debate. The transmitter was definitely at his waist. The wire that others have reported seeing in the 2nd debate is clearly visible. It seems to come right from the transmitter at his waist.

Why wouldn't anyone believe that the Great Deceiver would stoop to such hideous tactics? There is nothing in his background or track record to indicate he wouldn't. If he can deceive us into a war, wearing a transmitter is child's play. Wake up Republicans. This man is a war criminal perpetuating the greatest hoax the world has ever seen. What would it take to get you to see what this man is made of?

5:28 PM  
Anonymous said...

If there is a story here, I hope it is truthfully exposed. I am more concerned about the issues brought up at the last debate. The health care issue is certainly important. Kerry talked about health care, and it sounded plausible, the president said he didn't want the Federal government running "his" health care. Bush said he had a better plan that didn't involve the federal government. Where is it? He had four years to have a plan and had congress on his side. The issues are important and people need to listen. I am sure the president is receiving his cues from an electronic source. His is dyslexic and can't read well, if at all. He should just come out and tell us how hanicapped he is.

5:35 PM  
Max said...

Who cares if Bush was wired? I thought being "wired" 24/7 was one of those perks of being president. It doesnt mean anything important. So what if he was getting help with the debate. I honestly doubt that there would have been any controversy if he just decided to use notes prepared by someone else. ITS THE SAME THING! Leave it alone.

5:46 PM  
Anonymous said...

It is not funny if it is true. Will the candidates pass through a bug detector before next debate?

6:02 PM  
Anonymous said...

The bulge in the jacket is only one piece of strong evidence among many others. On CNN and Fox News in France on D-Day, another man's voice could be heard reading Bush's speech only seconds before the president: the deeper-voiced male voice would state a phrase, then the president would repeat it. Many others like myself saw this in June and were agog...I'm relieved to see from earlier postings that others also witnessed this bizarre live scenario. This is not the first time that audio prompts have been broadcast.

Bush speaks like someone being prompted: he stops and starts at awkward moments, his shifting eyes from side to side, and mispronunciations are pocked with strange statements like "commiserate...not commiserate..." as if accidentally repeating a correction, or "Say something about the tax code, say something about the tax code" as if accidentally repeating a command. His sudden improvements in syntax, vocabulary, and sentence coherency also support the theory that he is being prompted.

Several have posed the question, "If Bush is wired, why did he bomb during the first debate?" The question avoids the fact that Bush's poor performance during that first debate is what truly aroused suspicion. He had the appearance of someone whose IFB had been disrupted. About 30 minutes into the debate he became flustered and frightened, repeating several lines again and again. "ya can't say its wrong war, wrong time"

I worked with reporters for years, and there's nothing I dreaded more than that frightened look of someone working without a script or an IFB and they're on live television and aren't sure what to do.

I came to the conclusion that Bush was wired after the first debate, recalling the June incident as well. I won't pretend to have answers about the bulge in his jacket, but I loved the links in other postings. Transmission would have to cover a great distance, and be secure to avoid disruption or sabotage. I have a feeling that some savvy folks did just that during the first press conference.

I believe nay-sayers are avoiding the real evidence. Try de-legimitizing this theory by tossing around labels like "conspiracy theory," "tin foil head," etc. Yes, we have deadly serious issues in this campaign that posters are well-informed about, no doubt....Lying about the reason for invading a country that had nothing do with 9/11 in order to profit from war...destroying the environment and rolling back the Clean Air Act...the first president with a net loss of jobs since Herbert Hoover. There are other sites with heated discussions on these vital issues.

Mounting evidence supports the idea that our president is literally a puppet. Too much evidence suggests he is receiving audio prompts during debates and press conferences.

So who are you really voting for if you vote for Bush?

6:03 PM  
Anonymous said...

What is more pathetic? Bush's first debate performance not wired, or that his handlers did not have enough faith that he could think on his feet. The result was the same. The man can not think on his feet. Or, he cannot think, period. Osama is still at large, Sadam (we controlled his airspace and inspectors were in his country) was not a threat. Anyone who still believes Sadam had anything to do with 9/11 should apply for a post in Bush's second adminstration (if the country is unfortunate enough). Bush needs more lockstep morons - Colin Powell and Donald Rumsfeld will be gone

6:26 PM  
Anonymous said...

Who give a sh** if Bush was wired? You have a website devoted to this? Get a life.

6:31 PM  
Anonymous said...

Bush a successful business man????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Who's the comedian who wrote that? The man failed time and again in business and had to be bailed out by his daddy's rich friends. Do your freakin' homework, bonehead before you make us all spew our beverages out our noses laughing over your imbecilic platitudes.

6:38 PM  
Anonymous said...

just See! Bush Wired!

6:49 PM  
Anonymous said...

If Bush used an ear-piece for a speach (like State of the Union or D-Day), who cares? It's like a tele-prompter.

If he uses it during a Q and A session, that get's a little iffy. I think Americans expect that our President should be able to answer questions for himself. I think most people would be disturbed if it turned out he couldn't.

If he uses it during a debate it's akin to cheating and he should immediately resign.

6:53 PM  
Anonymous said...

I don't know if Bush was wired or not. I am an Australian, and we didn't see the debate in any depth here, but I know one thing; he needs to be wired. He is an inarticulate, insincere, dangerous little man who needs to go!

6:54 PM  
Anonymous said...

You can't be serious. First, it's non-issue. Second, anyone with an hours experience in Adobe Photoshop can put a bulge on George's back. It is a simple matter, which would only take a few seconds.

What you liberals just don't understand, is that what you work for and earn is yours, and what you don't work for is not yours. Why should you expect somebody else to work half of the year to pay for your government programs? You only expect yourself to work for three months to pay your tax bill.

Do you think that John Kerry pays his fair share? His rich, let's look out for the folks tax bill? I say this because he doesn't. In order to evade his tax responsibility he formed a subchapter s corporation with himself as the sole shareholder, and director. As director he has elected to pay himself 300-odd thousand dollars. This may seem like a lot to you, but to Kerry, I assure you it is not. The rest of the millions he earned he merely took as capital gains, at a much lower tax rate. The point is that it is not the extremely wealthy that look after you - the famed top 1%. It is the people that go to work in the dark in the morning and come home in the dark. Pouring their life and thier sole into their job, or perhaps their own business that the grew from nothing. And at the end of the year, yes perhaps they have $150,000 but you know what - they worked harder than you, they took on more risk than you did, and they deserve it.

The other thing is that if you would pull your head out of your *** you would realize that for all intensive puposes BUSH IS YOUR DREAM DEMOCRAT. He expanded Medicare beyond all reason. The real