Bush Campaign Manager to Press, Voters: Eat our S*&# & Smile
From NBC News, Meet the Press, October 17:
MR. RUSSERT: Before we go, Mr. Mehlman, clear up this mystery that has been raging on the Internet. This was the first debate, George Bush at the podium, the bulge in the back of the suit. All right. Come clean. What is it?
MR. MEHLMAN: The president, in fact, was receiving secret signals from aliens in outer space. You heard it here on MEET THE PRESS.
MR. SHRUM: You mean you sent Rove into orbit.
MR. RUSSERT: It was not a bulletproof vest or magnets for his back or anything?
MR. MEHLMAN: I'm not sure what it was, but the gentleman responsible for the tailoring of that suit is no longer working for this administration.
MR. SHRUM: Well, wait a minute. Now, the president only wears Oxford clothes. I'll bet that tailor is still there.
MR. RUSSERT: May we all be smiling this way on November 2.
Postscript: And this is not the first time that Meet the Press has been confronted with the issue. Last February, the show covered for the president when a radiofreeusa.net editor emailed a query asking if Bush had been prompted in his Oval Office interview with Russert.Executive producer Betsy Fischer responded to the inquiry with an email that said the president wore no earpiece "at any time" in the show. She didn't explain how Meet the Press had established this, or whether MTP asked the White House about it before or after the interview.
MR. RUSSERT: Before we go, Mr. Mehlman, clear up this mystery that has been raging on the Internet. This was the first debate, George Bush at the podium, the bulge in the back of the suit. All right. Come clean. What is it?
MR. MEHLMAN: The president, in fact, was receiving secret signals from aliens in outer space. You heard it here on MEET THE PRESS.
MR. SHRUM: You mean you sent Rove into orbit.
MR. RUSSERT: It was not a bulletproof vest or magnets for his back or anything?
MR. MEHLMAN: I'm not sure what it was, but the gentleman responsible for the tailoring of that suit is no longer working for this administration.
MR. SHRUM: Well, wait a minute. Now, the president only wears Oxford clothes. I'll bet that tailor is still there.
MR. RUSSERT: May we all be smiling this way on November 2.
Postscript: And this is not the first time that Meet the Press has been confronted with the issue. Last February, the show covered for the president when a radiofreeusa.net editor emailed a query asking if Bush had been prompted in his Oval Office interview with Russert.
posted by is bush wired? at 3:58 PM
55 Comments:
I am a recovering skeptic who is now completely convinced that Bush was wired. In my own personal research on the validity of the "bulge", I just finished rereading the debate "rules" and I'm
surprised that these haven't been scrutinized in more detail, given that there are clearly several articles which facilitate Bush wearing, operating, and concealing a wire. In fact, we NEVER would have known
about the bulge if the debate rules had not been explicitely broken by the TV producers. I would be curious to know which candidate specifically requested the following rules, which I have paraphrased below:
(From the memorandum of understanding which I downloaded from Cspan:
at http://www.c-span.org/pdf/memounderstanding.pdf )
* Section 9 article a, (v) says that there will be no cutaways to cadidates who are not currently answering a question.
Conclusion: this means we wouldn't see Bush's constant blinking as he concentrated on the earpiece feeds. (could be a reach)
Section 9 article a, (vi) says that the camera in the rear may only be used to take shots of the moderator.
Conclusion: Bush campaign was anticipating no rear shots whatsoever and this is what prompted them to hide the bulge in his back which otherwise wouldn't be the first place to hide something like this.
Indeed, every shot of the bulge came from a rear camera shot of Bush which the public was not supposed to see. Had the TV producers followed this rule, we would never have seen the bulge.
Section 9 article a, (x) says that each candidate must be allocated one hour of "Briefing" time and extreme measures are taken to safeguard secrecy during this time.
Conclusion: This may indeed be a bit of a stretch but I can tell you from experience as a software engineer that you never ever perform a live demonstration of any technology before an audience unless you
first test it in that setting.
Section 9 article a, (xiv) says that each candidate is permitted to have one staff member "in the wings or in the immediate backstage area during the debate"... All other staff must vacate this area.
Conclusion: This is by far the most damning evidence yet and I can't believe this hasn't been pointed out. What is the explanation for the necessity of this person and why must everyone else vacate the area?
Who wrote this rule? Note that exceptions are made for secret service and medical advisors for Dick and Bush so this is obviously not the reason.
Section 9 article a, (xvi) says that each candidate may have a photographer in the wings but they may _not_ take photos during the debate itself.
Conclusion: So they don't take photos of the bulge of course
Section 9 article b, says that camera positions must be agreed upon and communicated to both parties. Article c states that, during the 2nd debate, a roving camera can be used but can only show audience members _while_ they are asking a question.
Section 11, article d, says that each candidate will have access to a direct feed from the television production to 2 monitors located in the private seclusion of the dressing room area.
Conslusion: this is where people are feeding the person "in the wings" who is feeding Bush.
Read it yourself - you be the judge. Who insisted on these specific rules? Are they a departure from past debate rules? Keep the story alive - the real conspiracy is why the main-stream press isn't pushing harder. Are they afraid to ask Bush directly? They weren't afraid to ask Clinton about DNA on a blue dress!
First they get Georges de Paris, tailor to the presidents since Johnson, to "fall on his needle" and blame the suit he tailored (to exquisite perfection I suspect), then they sack him for incompetence.
That's the Bush administration for you. Let's hope Kerry gets elected and rights this wrong.
Hang in there Georges! And if you happen to read this, now would be a good time to tell the whole truth. Debout enfants de la Patrie!
Russert had a perfect chance to show the footage (2nd debate) of the wire (when Bush adjusted his tie) and ask they comment on it.
Lets hope someone askes the white house directly on that point.
Georges de Paris, yes there is someone that could blow it open, but he wont hurt his client base by crossing the prezzy....
Thats a waste of time, I think.
But there are those out there which could blow it open. Someone may have the courage to realize that this man, regardless of party, is unfit for office.
Reagan used humor to evade real charges quite effectively. Now, the Bush team seems to be trying the “Humor Tactic” to evade this ‘Prompter’ charge as well.
Here is what Reagan did:
In the first debate on October 7, 1984, Walter Mondale said, “And perhaps the dominant domestic issue of our times is what do we do about these enormous deficits. I respect the President. I respect the Presidency and I think he knows that. But the fact of it is every estimate by this Administration about the size of the deficit has been off by billions and billions of dollars. As a matter of fact, over four years, they've missed the mark by nearly $600 billion.”
Later, the reporter Andrea Mitchell asked Reagan, “Mr. President, what about Mondale’s charges?”
Reagan made the reply, “Well, I guess he should pay them.”
Now this was funny in one sense, but in the sense that massive debts are no joking matter, Reagan’s reply was not funny at all.
Similarly, while it is funny in one sense for Mr. Mehlman to say that the president is communicating with aliens, it is not funny at all that there seems to be some object on the president’s back; that two plausible theories outlined on this site are that it could be a receiver or a medical device; and that the administration is evading rather than directly answering a simple question.
The video images from multiple angles are not the only evidence of the use of a prompter. The White House website has this audio (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/06/20040605-6.html) in which at 22:40 you can hear what sounds like a prompter saying President Bush’s line before he says it, specifically, “the French are going to provide great advice.”
Suspicion that the President is using a prompter is reasonable. America is not well served when officials deflect reasonable charges with humor. America needs answers not evasion.
Seems to me there's another way to approach this, especially with the likes of Mehlmann...why ask "what is the bulge?" and allow him to dismiss it...why not just ask the direct question??: "Does President Bush receive prompting from anyone during his speeches and/or debates? It has been basically proven that he has in the past and it seems quite apparent that he still does. Can you answer that - yes, or no?"
Addendum to my post above re direct question, because the obvious response is that they'd just lie and say "no." But, that's my point - at least you're FORCING an answer to the question that could later be revealed as a blatant lie. Mehlman's joking response could later be discounted as just that - he can say I never said there wasn't anything there...
While we don't know what was up President Bush's back during the debates, let's clarify one thing: a foreign object was present in ALL three debates. There are a lot of threads and stories (including Mr. Russert's own statements) suggesting the bulge was visible only during the first debate.
Here are links to pictures:
Bulge in first debateBulge in second debateBulge in third debateA wireless receiver system (with descrambling capability) may be a wild theory, but whatever it was under the president's coat, it's very disconcerting and a lot af American's would like to know the truth. At least the news agencies ought to admit that something was there and stop acting like this is a non-issue. The amazing lack of curiosity among our nation's "finest" reporters is completely nausiating. It seems they prefer to repeat each other's gossip or blather punditry rather than investigate any real story.
For the major agencies to go with this, they will have to be spoon fed. Will anyone ever figure out what this is all about!?!?
Let's do a little bit of investigative journalism here: somebody in DC should pay a visit to Georges Du Paris at 14th Street and G, three blocks from the White House. Ask him how he feels now that his most famous client has left him.
Also, the Times ran an Op-Art earlier this week, asking a photographer to talk around NY and find mysterious bulges under the jackets of random New Yorkers.
So-- here's the obvious thing to do. Actually photograph models wearing a transmitter under a jacket. Find someone who's 6 feet tall and 190 pounds, and wears a 44 long jacket. (handsewn probably not necessary...) The wireless receivers should be easy to mockup; the portable defibrillator less so, but it could be done. Certainly the manufacturer must have some pictures of how these would look under an outfit.
As I said on the previous thread, it would have been wise for Shrum to keep his mouth shut and not play along.
Jon
Evidently Bush did not use the prompter for the reading of "The Pet Goat" on September 11, 2001. Andrew Card had to go directly to the president's ear to say "A second plane has hit the World Trade Center. America is under attack." The White House staff must have been upset that the prompter was not on that day because they could have followed up Card's message with something like, "We're under attack. You need to act now. Excuse yourself from this photo-op so that you (we) can address this national security emergency." And then what a waste of advisor Karl Rove's time and reputation to have to come up with the phony excuse for Bush just sitting there during the attack: "The President thought for a second or two about getting up and walking out of the room. But the drill was coming to a close and he didn't want to alarm the children." [ABC, 9/11/02] So the prompter could have helped that day, but the larger problem remains: America cannot have a president who relies on a prompter.
It is a back brace.
I work in physical therapy there are many braces for several injuries that hold back convex and shoulders in. the lighter version for wearing out in public looks identical to this.
If I get the time I will send some photos of several models of braces that look exactly like this to the sites owner.
I think Bush is an a$$, but he is wearing a back brace.
Great idea to mimic the New York Times' insipid photo op-art piece.
Combine your two ideas: Get a jacket from Georges Du Paris made with the same fabric as the President's jacket, so that the behavior of the fabric is a constant in the experiment as well.
If it is a back brace, there is no motive for the White House to deny that Bush was wearing something during the debate. Who would hold it against the president that he wears a back brace? They could say he needs it because he twisted his back clearing brush and using a chain saw. The macho spin opportunity of a back brace is too positive, so it can't be a back brace.
I don't know, the PR bubble that the President is living in now has become a bit excessive. Advisers might actually believe that admitting to a bad back might cost one or two percentage points in the polls. Remember, these aren't human beings we're talking about. They're PR analysts. The tiniest, most insignificant thing matters to them in terms of public perception.
But in all seriousness, the LifeCor defibrillator seems the best theory to me. If the President was on the verge of a heart attack, I think they'd go as far as they're going now to cover it up. A back brace could be admitted to, but not the possibility that the President could drop dead any day now. Not this close to an election. It might make people reconsider their vote, given that a dead Bush would mean Cheney as President. And I'm willing to bet enough Bush supporters don't like Cheney to swing the election in Kerry's favor. That's the stream of thought I see behind this.
The irony of this whole bulge controversy is that in previous campaigns it has been Karl Rove who has destroyed the opposition with "whisper campaigns."
The documentary about Rove -- "Bush's Brain" -- lists these examples of Rove-created rumors:
-- the rumor that Governor Ann Richards of Texas was lesbian
-- the rumor that McCain's time in Viet Nam made him psychologically unstable
-- the rumor that McCain had fathered an illegitimate black child (when he actually adopted a Bangladeshi girl from one of Mother Teresa's orphanages)
Such dramatic irony for Rove to be facing this "Battle of the Bulge" now. And perhaps the greatest irony is that while Rove's whisper campaigns were all distortions, this story of the bulge on President Bush's back is true, and the only question is, "what IS the bulge?"
Interesting on the defibrillator motive for White House evasion tactic. Edwards outpolls Cheney for the top spot.
Wow... this story was losing momentum, but the BULGE just won't quit... I guess its as stubborn as Bush himself.
isbushwired.com: Thanks for the transcript of the Meet the Press interview, I saw it today and was speechless... for a moment.
I have just added the photo from Bush's 9/11 commission appearance to the BULGE PHOTO GALLERY. If you have not seen it, its a real gem!
http://bushwired.blogspot.com/
More later!
Why hasnt this been made a big deal by anyone and when is it going to be? This is very important, especially if no one is giving a simple answer.
Thanks to one of you anonymice who followed up on my point. Just one response to you:
"Get a jacket from Georges Du Paris"
Well, they run about $8000, and you have to wait some time while he sews it. A ready-to-wear 44L should be just fine. Of course, also take a photo with a model wearing a bullet-proof vest, to test that theory as well.
But I do hope someone can pay du Paris a visit tomorrow and ask how he's handling the news that he "no longer works for the administration."
Jon
The media in America are run for profit. The big media companies see the best opportunity for greater profits in consolidation. The problem is FCC rules that limit the consolidation. The idea behind these limits is that diversity of opinion through diverse ownership of the media is essential to democratic government. There must be a thorough debate in the 'marketplace of ideas.'
But for people more interested in the 'marketplace of profits' than the 'marketplace of ideas,' in other words, for the big media companies that are pushing up against the FCC market share limits, a second Bush tern is needed. Why? Michael Powell, FCC head and son of Secretary of State Colin Powell, believes in total deregulation of the media. The media giants will be able to grow as big and monopolistic as they want if Michael Powell/Bush have their way.
Look at Sinclair Broadcasting, the largest owner of TV stations in the nation -- preparing to air a 60 minute commercial free attack on Kerry with the audacity to call it news! -- and you see the future of 'news' under a right-wing media monopoly.
The people who own big media want Bush to win so they can increase their profits through consolidation. This story of the Prompter President is being ignored by big media because of greed. They know it would cost Bush the election and that a President Kerry who stands with the American people rather than with big business would maintain the current FCC limits on media consolidation.
So .... 800 of us pitch in $10 each in a raffle for a Presidential jacket!
Hmmm.... So by having a 'light moment' at the end of the Meet the Press segment this morning, Tim Russert is helping the administration use the 'deflect with humor' strategy. Whether he did this with political intent or not, I suppose we will never know. But given the kind of Republican spin demanded by the heads of Fox (as shown in the documentary 'Outfoxed'), one wonders if this 'light moment' was perhaps something orchestrated by Mr. Russert's superiors. Superiors thinking more about media deregulation under a second Bush term than they are about the importance of the American people knowing whether or not their president participated in the debates together with Karl Rove.
Russert failed his audience completely by letting Mehlman get away with that. He ought to be ashamed. Let's get some email addresses posted so readers of this site can implore people like Russert, Lehrer, et al., to do the damn follow-up on this story. They can say "I don't know what it was" straight thru November 2nd unless and until someone with a mic earns their living.
-Seattle
Notice how all of this can be shot down with the exclamation, "You guys are just a bunch of lunatic conspiracy theorists!"
It's part of the Bush/Rove strategy: Take such outrageous actions that anyone pointing out what you're doing will look like an alarmist.
Example 1: Suggest privatizing social security. When it is pointed out that the plan will cost $2 trillion and lead to reduced checks for seniors, call such accurate charges inaccurate.
Example 2: Feed the president information via radio waves. If caught, laugh at how outrageous this conspiracy theory is.
I didn't give the "Bush bulge" story any credibility at first, but it took only a few hours of internet searching to find the pictures from the first, second and third debates. These photos and a reading of the debate rules that were supposed to restrict camera views of the candidates' backs convinced me that Bush was wearing a wire, especially since the Bush administration has not yet decided the American people deserve an upfront explanation for the OBVIOUSLY foreign object under Bush's jacket. Up until I witnessed Bush's dismal performance at the first debate, he had my respect and my vote, and I resent the Bush administration's flippant comments ridiculing anyone who would dare ask questions about this--dismissing them as radical, left-wing conspiracy theorists.
I am even angrier at the media. The lack of serious media coverage about this issue has convinced me that it's a fallacy that a biased "liberal media" is trying to sway the heart and minds of America. If Bush has been getting this kind of help throughout his four years in office without the American people being made aware, then I think it's safe to say that someone high up in the Bush administration, my guess is Karl Rove, is using unethical tactics to apply pressure on reporters and media outlets to keep stories out of the press. I don't want a conservative media or a liberal media, but a media that seeks the truth with diligence and reports it fairly.
My only hope is that some reporter out there is courageous enough to do some serious investigative work on behalf of the American people, or that Kerry’s people will get some guts and raises hell until this issue is treated with the seriousness it deserves.
Bush IS wired. He wears a device in his ear that allows the Secret Service to be in constant verbal contact with him in case they need to direct him for his own safety.
Now, you will never have confirmation of that because the Secret Service won't say what they do or don't do to protect the POTUS.
Right now I'm assuming that most modern Presidents have been wired in such a fashion and I'm okay with that.
He was probably also wearing light body armor, at least something able to deflect hard plastic stilettos and other types of stabbing weapons that might slip by security. If you recall, he and Kerry both mingled after each debate.
Did the Bushies say he wasn't sportin' ballistic material? Oh my! Imagine them lying about the President's safety gear. I'm okay with that, too.
However, I believe that his handlers were using his Secret Service receiver to feed him prompts and such during the debates as well as using it every other time he doesn't have paper in front of him to read from. I'm not okay with that. But I also don't think the presence of the earpiece will be proved so the cheating will never be found out.
I've been wondering why the Kerry camp has been quiet about all of this and I now think the reason is that they know about it. I think Kerry wears a Secret Service-issued earpiece as well. It's probably part of the Secret Service protection package that is accorded to the nominee of the challenging party.
It's a Catch-22 situation for Kerry. He can't admit to the earpiece as protection gear so he can't point up the cheating use of it during the debates.
That's what I think, anyway.
Want to get the press to cover this? Tell them to cover it!
Meet the Press:
email: mtp@nbc.com
website: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/
Newshour with Jim Lehrer:
email: onlinenewshour@newshour.org
website: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/
ABC News:
email: support@abcnews.go.com
website: http://abcnews.go.com/Reference/story?id=54216
CBS News:
email: follow links on website
website: http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/home/main100.shtml
FOX News:
email: comments@foxnews.com
website: http://www.foxnews.com/
Interesting analogy about a clause for avoiding military service.
The original Catch-22 from the book was that a soldier could get out of the army in WWII if he was crazy. A soldier who said he wanted out, however, clearly wasn't crazy. And a crazy soldier would not ask to get out. So the craziness exemption wouldn't get anyone out.
In the case of Kerry and Bush, Kerry chose to fight in his generation's war and carries shrapnel in his leg to this day. Bush, on the other hand, had Poppy get him a place in the National Guard, then took too many drugs and had to skip his physical exam to avoid getting caught, and finally got out early somehow (thanks Poppy Bush) and went to Harvard Business School.
Excuse me, with that record, why does anyone in the military like Bush?
Kerry is the candidate with the 'right stuff.'
Video, Audio and Photos of
Bush was Wired
A new poll by The Economist found that 24% of American respondents who were registered to vote had seen photographs during the second Presidential debate showing a bulge under the back of President Bush's jacket. While 30% of Democrats had seen a photo, just 18% of Republicans had. Of those who had seen a photo, 49% believed the bulge was caused by a radio receiver Bush was using to communicate with his team during the debate; while 18% believed the President's explanation that it was a fold caused by the fall of his jacket.
http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/YouGovP.pdf
Its nice to see the tone of the discussion focus on facts and serious debate.
Dont think for a moment the press doesnt come here and see the posts.
While we dont pretend to have delusions of grandure, this certainly looks to have become ground 0 for the evolution of this story.
Keep posting FACTS and NEW PICTURES
Hey, story is back in the New York Times....
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/18/politics/campaign/18letter.html
Looks like there is some controversy about the VP debate:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40570-2004Oct17.html
The White House says it was a breath mint....
This question they answer, the other one they dont.
Keep the pressure up.
It seems maybe that one reason this story is not given enough attention by the mainstream media is because Bush lost the debates.
Seems like the attitude is 'so what, didn't help them'
Thats wrong, if he cheated we deserve to know
If it has appeared in the Washington Post and New York Times today then this story still has alot of life.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Comments: 202-456-1111
President George W. Bush:
president@whitehouse.gov
Vice President Richard Cheney:
vice.president@whitehouse.gov
Dallas morning news (req'd substription, so I posted the text below link):
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/101804dnedivoxpop.4e6b4.html
"It's not another Battle of the Bulge, but...
WashingtonMonthly.com's Kevin Drum is all worked up over the weird square bulge emerging from President Bush's back during the debates:
I know that this whole "Bush Bulge" thing seems like a bit of a joke, and I suppose in a way it is. But I've got a dead serious question anyway: What the hell is it?
After the bulge initially appeared in the first debate, the White House simply denied anything was there. His tailor was trotted out to say it was just a seam pucker. But in the second debate, the bulge was still there, and it was no seam pucker. It was clearly a square about 6 inches on a side. Then, in the third debate, it was still there.
Look, I don't think it's a transmitter beaming secret prompts into Mr. Bush's ear. But as these pictures from each of the three debates shows, there's very clearly something there. The White House can't just blandly write it off as a weird Internet rumor when photos from three separate debates all show it.
So what's going on? Shouldn't someone get a serious answer to this question? He is the president of the United States, after all. "
Thats a re-print
The original article with photos is here:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
I think there is something in his jacket.
I also think these stories of why he has missed his physical is not being discussed in the press. There may be a connection, then this site, isbushwired, needs to be expaned to include medical devices.
So we either have a cheater or a medical liability as President.
William Safire, New York Times:
He's pushing the republican gay-gate story. Whats wrong, cant win on the issues???
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/18/opinion/18safire.html?hp
Write him and tell him to stop being a Republican lap dog...
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/
Here is one website you can write too. I am thinking it may be a good idea to just hit one group with emails, or one personality. Paula Zahn has had the bush wired question on her page.
Is anyone aware of the Bush drugged story. Just googleor search for is bush drugged.
If you want to learn even more, do a search for "Bush scandals," or "did bush instigate 911."
Just an observation, but Mr. Mehlman was completely insane!
Mr. Leher was truely disappointing with regard to how he allowed such rubbish to go on during that show.
- totally frustrated with the current state of affairs.
It's Your Terror
Stalwart reporter Seymour 'Sy' Hersh has been at it again, scaring people with the truth when they were already terrified enough by imaginary nonsense.
Earlier this year Hersh, a New Yorker reporter dubbed 'the closest thing we have to a terrorist' by neocon Pentagon adviser Richard Perle, broke the story of torture and sexual humiliation of Iraqis at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
This week, in a speech at Berkelely, he had some more revelations for fearful Americans:
"My government has a secret unit that since December of 2001 has been disappearing people just like the Brazilians and the Argentineans did. Rumsfeld decided after 9/11 that he could not wait. The president signed a secret document... There's a team of people, they fly in unmarked planes, they fly in Gulfstreams, they have their own choppers, they don't carry American passports, and they just grab people."
Could Hersh be next for a disappearing act? Could you? No one knows! It's all the fun of the (arms) fair!
LAUNCHED:
http://www.bushbulge.com
or
http://www.totalwebsites.com/bushbulge
This site is devoted to finding out the truth about the bulge before the election! The American public deserves to know the truth.
MR. RUSSERT: Before we go, Mr. Mehlman, clear up this mystery that has been raging on the Internet. This was the first debate, George Bush at the podium, the bulge in the back of the suit. All right. Come clean. What is it?
MR. MEHLMAN: I'm not sure what it was, but the gentleman responsible for the tailoring of that suit is no longer working for this administration.
Why am I not surprised that rather than admit blame the administration just fires someone who isn't responsible for the mistake so they can say they've 'dealt with it'.
Yeah, like firing Hans Blix, L. Paul Bremer, and General Sanchez solved Iraq, right?
http://bushsdefibrillator.blogspot.com
Video, Audio, and Photos
Bush Is Wired
Expert Scientific Testimony, Video Analysis, Audio Examples , Photo Gallery
This story is out there. It made the splash page of the BBC home page for a day. Also, check out the UK satirical magazin Private Eye which seeks out hipocrisy. The URL is:
www.private-eye.co.uk
I guess the president deserves a little more credit than I've been giving him.
If I had Karl Rove's voice in my ear and Dick Cheney's hand up my ass, I don't know that I could function at all!
The lack of agressiveness by the mainstream press on this issue is disappointing and depressing.
Great article! Thanks.
Thanks for interesting article.
Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!
warhammer gold warhammer money warhammer accounts tibia money tibia gold tibia item runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape money runescape gold runescape gp runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling cheap rs2 powerleveling runescape equipment buy rs equipment runescape runes cheap rs2 runes runescape logs cheap rs2 logs runescape items buy runescape items runescape quest point rs2 quest point cheap runescape questpoint runescape gold runescape items runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape accounts runescape gp runescape accounts runescape money runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling tibia gold dofus kamas buy dofus kamas wow power leveling wow powerleveling runescape questpoint rs2 questpoint Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling Hellgate money Hellgate gold buy runescape logs buy rs2 items cheap runescape items Hellgate London gold Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape items rs2 accounts cheap rs2 equipments lotro gold buy lotro gold buy runescape money buy runescape gold buy runescape runes lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape gold cheap rs2 powerleveling eve isk eve online isk buy runescape power leveling rs2 power leveling tibia gold tibia item runescape accounts Fiesta Silver Fiesta Gold Scions of Fate Gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium SOF Gold Age Of Conan Gold AOC Gold ArchLord gold tibia money tibia gold runescape accounts runescape gold cheap rs2 powerleveling buy ArchLord gold DDO Plat Dungeons and Dragons Online Plat
warhammer gold warhammer money warhammer accounts tibia money tibia gold tibia item runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape money runescape gold runescape gp runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling cheap rs2 powerleveling runescape equipment buy rs equipment runescape runes cheap rs2 runes runescape logs cheap rs2 logs runescape items buy runescape items runescape quest point rs2 quest point cheap runescape questpoint runescape gold runescape items runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape accounts runescape gp runescape accounts runescape money runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling tibia gold dofus kamas buy dofus kamas wow power leveling wow powerleveling runescape questpoint rs2 questpoint Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling Hellgate money Hellgate gold buy runescape logs buy rs2 items cheap runescape items Hellgate London gold Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape items rs2 accounts cheap rs2 equipments lotro gold buy lotro gold buy runescape money buy runescape gold buy runescape runes lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape gold cheap rs2 powerleveling eve isk eve online isk buy runescape power leveling rs2 power leveling tibia gold tibia item runescape accounts Fiesta Silver Fiesta Gold Scions of Fate Gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium SOF Gold Age Of Conan Gold AOC Gold ArchLord gold tibia money tibia gold runescape accounts runescape gold cheap rs2 powerleveling buy ArchLord gold DDO Plat Dungeons and Dragons Online Plat
Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!
I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?
And you et an account on Twitter?
Post a Comment
<< Home